New Course:Designing Production-Grade Deep Learning Pipelines, now on Udemy.Enroll

Research

Machine Learning for Risk and Resilience in Complex Systems

Predicting how risk emerges, interacts and cascades, and turning those predictions into decisions that hold up.

Peer-Reviewed Journal Papers
Citations
H-Index
Papers Reviewed
Journals Reviewed For

Research Themes

One Core Method. Two Edges. Three Frontiers.

The Core Method

01

Machine Learning for Risk and Resilience in Complex Systems

Proven in Infrastructure · Project & Asset Management

Predicting how risk emerges and interacts in systems whose components depend on each other, using multi-output supervised learning built for high-dimensional, non-linear interactions, and forecasting infrastructure project performance with R² of 0.97.

Multi-Output Regression · Deep Neural Networks · Random Forest · XGBoost · Support Vector Machines · Ensemble Methods · Feature Importance

Two Sharpening Edges

02

Graph-Theoretic Risk Modeling

Networks · Systemic Risk

Modeling how local disruptions escalate into system-wide failure using network analysis of interdependent risks, pinpointing where intervention does the most to contain a cascade.

Complex Network Analytics (CNA) · Graph Theory · NetworkX · Interdependent Networks · Cascading Failures · Systemic Risk

03

Optimization-Augmented Machine Learning

Metaheuristics · Decision Support

Replacing exhaustive search with metaheuristics: improving training efficiency by ~90%, carrying predictions through to multi-objective decisions, and releasing the approach as an open-source package with 4,000+ downloads.

Particle Swarm Optimization · Genetic Algorithms · Pattern Search · NSGA-II · Multi-Objective Optimization

Three Applied Frontiers

04

Hazard Forecasting

Climate

Forecasting flood and wildfire hazard from geospatial time series using ConvLSTM and CNN+LSTM architectures, reaching an NSE of 89% on urban flood depth and ~38% better wildfire prediction than baseline models.

ConvLSTM · CNN+LSTM · Geospatial Time Series · Remote Sensing · TFX on Vertex AI

05

Freight & Air Mobility Risk

Logistics & Supply Chains · Advanced Air Mobility

Predicting accident likelihood and impact for drone-based hazmat delivery using a four-model neural-network suite on geospatial data, reaching R² of 0.95 and informing $14M CAD in proposed freight research.

TensorFlow · Neural Networks · Geospatial Features · Hazmat Risk · Supply-Chain Risk

06Emerging

Language Models over Risk Networks

Agentic AI Systems

Testing how reliably language models reason over cascading-failure networks: comparing chain-of-thought, structured and GraphRAG-style prompting on multi-hop dependency graphs, and extending toward small models that call network-analysis tools, running locally.

LLM Evaluation · Multi-Hop Reasoning · GraphRAG · Small Language Models · Agentic Tool Use

Published Research

Peer-Reviewed Publications

Full record on Google Scholar, Web of Science and ORCID.

Journal Articles 8

  1. 2026Real-Time Architecture

    Real-Time Machine Learning Risk Prediction for Autonomous Drone Operations

    A closed-loop ML architecture continuously processes real-time flight, shipment and environmental data to estimate accident likelihood and initiate mitigation responses, with parallel ANN models predicting multi-stakeholder consequence impacts on the public, businesses and customers, closing the loop from prediction to resilience.

    ANN · Closed-Loop Architecture · Real-Time Inference · Multi-Output Prediction · Autonomous Decision Support · Consequence Modeling

    Moussa, A., E. Hassini, M. Ezzeldin, and W. El-Dakhakhni (2026). “Machine Learning-Enabled Real-Time Risk Prediction and Mitigation in Drone-based Hazmat Delivery.” Research in Transportation Business & Management, 65: 101585. DOI

  2. 2026Freight Logistics

    Heavy Cargo Drones as a Hub-to-Hub Freight Mode

    Examines heavy cargo drones as a mode for moving freight between logistics hubs, building on the Smart Freight Centre's work on drones in modern urban freight transportation networks.

    Heavy Cargo Drones · Freight Logistics · Advanced Air Mobility · Hub-to-Hub Networks

    Moussa, A., E. Hassini, M. Ezzeldin, and W. El-Dakhakhni (2026). “Heavy Cargo Drones for Hub-to-Hub Freight Logistics.” Transportation Planning and Technology. DOI

  3. 2025ML Pipeline

    Graph-Theoretic Machine Learning Pipeline for Cascading Risk Quantification

    A three-stage pipeline where complex network theory quantifies team interdependencies as graph features, ML models predict project performance, and network-based and optimization-based mitigation strategies reduce systemic exposure and build resilience into project delivery.

    Complex Network Theory · Graph Features · ANN · Random Forest · Cascading Risk · Systemic Risk

    Moussa, A., M. Ezzeldin, and W. El-Dakhakhni (2025). “Data-driven Assessment of Complexity-Induced Risks in Infrastructure Projects.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. DOI

  4. 2025Optimization Framework

    GA-Tuned ML and Multi-Objective Optimization for Performance Prediction

    Genetic algorithm hyperparameter tuning outperforms grid search across all ML models. Predictions then feed NSGA-II multi-objective optimization to generate optimized schedules and risk registers that improve KPIs and build resilience under real-world constraints.

    Genetic Algorithms · Hyperparameter Tuning · NSGA-II · Multi-Objective Optimization · Pareto Optimality · Decision Support

    Moussa, A., M. Ezzeldin, and W. El-Dakhakhni (2025). “Machine Learning and Optimization Strategies for Infrastructure Projects Risk Management.” Construction Management and Economics. DOI

  5. 2024Predictive System

    Supervised ML for Multi-KPI Prediction Under Interacting Systemic Risks

    ML models trained on historical project data to simultaneously predict five interdependent performance indicators under the combined effect of interacting and systemic risks, treating multi-output prediction as a first-class modeling problem rather than an afterthought.

    ANN · Random Forest · Decision Trees · Multi-KPI Prediction · Systemic Risk · Risk Interactions

    Moussa, A., M. Ezzeldin, and W. El-Dakhakhni (2024). “Predicting and Managing Risk Interactions and Systemic Risks in Infrastructure Projects Using Machine Learning.” Automation in Construction, 168: 105836. DOI

  6. 2023ML Pipeline

    Ensemble Machine Learning for Real-Time Dynamic Risk Prediction

    Ensemble algorithms trained on injury precursors to generate proactive, real-time safety risk predictions across work zones, moving risk management from reactive lagging indicators to predictive leading indicators.

    Ensemble ML · SVM · Random Forest · ANN · Hyperparameter Tuning · Leading Indicators

    Gondia, A., Moussa, A., M. Ezzeldin, and W. El-Dakhakhni (2023). “Machine Learning-based Construction Site Dynamic Risk Models.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 189: 122347. DOI

  7. 2023Review

    Intelligent Features in Construction Robotics: A Review

    A structured review of the intelligent capabilities built into construction robots, mapping where sensing, autonomy and decision-making have advanced and where gaps remain.

    Robotics · Intelligent Systems · Automation · Literature Review

    Attalla, A., O. Attalla, Moussa, A., D. Shafique, S. B. Raean, and T. Hegazy (2023). “Construction Robotics: Review of Intelligent Features.” International Journal of Intelligent Robotics and Applications, 7 (3): 535–555. DOI

  8. 2022Optimization Framework

    Complex Network Theory and Metaheuristic Optimization for Systemic Failure Modeling

    The origin of the network-theory edge: contractor interdependence quantified via weighted degree centrality on dynamic and static project networks, correlated with KPI degradation and mitigated through metaheuristic schedule reorganization. The foundation that later fuses with machine learning in the work above.

    Complex Network Theory · Weighted Degree Centrality · Dynamic Networks · Metaheuristic Optimization · Systemic Risk

    Moussa, A., and W. El-Dakhakhni (2022). “Managing Interdependence-Induced Systemic Risks in Infrastructure Projects.” Journal of Management in Engineering, 38 (5): 04022048. DOI

Conference Papers 2

  1. 2024Conference Paper

    Heavy Cargo Drones for Last-Mile Delivery

    An investigation of heavy cargo drones for last-mile delivery, presented at the Canadian Transportation Research Forum's annual conference in Kelowna.

    Heavy Cargo Drones · Last-Mile Delivery · Freight

    Moussa, A., E. Hassini, M. Ezzeldin, and W. El-Dakhakhni (2024). “Investigation of Heavy Cargo Drones for Last-Mile Delivery.” Canadian Transportation Research Forum (CTRF), BC, Canada, May 2024.

  2. 2023Conference Paper

    Prefeasibility of 2,000 MW Remote Hydro Generation

    A prefeasibility study for integrating 2,000 MW of hydro generation in remote Northern Ontario, presented at CIGRE Canada.

    Energy Infrastructure · Hydro Generation · Prefeasibility

    Alrhieh, S., Moussa, A., M. Maghraby, W. El-Dakhakhni, and C. Tang (2023). “Prefeasibility Study for Integrating 2000 MW of Hydro Generation in Remote Northern Ontario.” CIGRE Canada Conference & Exhibition, BC, Canada, September 2023.

Research Philosophy

How I Think About Research

Pillar 01

Rigor Without Compromise

Research that cannot be reproduced is not research; it is speculation. Every model, pipeline and result is held to the standard of reproducibility, statistical validity and honest evaluation against strong baselines. Rigor is not a phase of the process; it is the process.

Pillar 02

Methods That Travel

A method that only works on the dataset it was built for has limited value. The goal is frameworks that generalize: where the core approach transfers across domains, scales to new data, and survives real-world conditions that were not anticipated at design time.

Pillar 03

From Prediction to Resilience

Predictive accuracy is a means, not an end. The full value of a model is realized only when its outputs inform decisions and build resilience, which requires interpretability, uncertainty quantification and integration with the constraints of operational environments.

Pillar 04

Reliability as a Design Constraint

Trustworthy systems are not built by accident. Reliability, resilience to distributional shift and graceful failure under unexpected inputs must be designed in from the start, not patched in after deployment reveals the gaps.

Where the Research Is Going

The next frontier is systems that don't just predict accurately, but predict reliably, explain themselves, and remain trustworthy as the world they model keeps changing. From graph-based risk intelligence to language models that reason over risk networks, the through-line is the same: AI that holds up under pressure, at scale, in production.

Let's Build Something That Matters

If you have a decision that depends on predicting risk in a complex system, I'd like to hear about it.